Integrated Entrepreneurship Education, Entrepreneurship Intention and Multidimensional Poverty Alleviation in West Jakarta

Poverty cannot be handled by individuals alone; they must work together with the government, society, and the state. Entrepreneurship is believed to be the driving force of the economy, opening up and creating job opportunities as a solution to poverty alleviation. The aims of this study were to describe the effect of integrated entrepreneurship education on the multidimensional poverty alleviation of housewives in the Krendang area, West Jakarta, mediated by entrepreneurship intention. This area is a densely populated area in Southeast Asia with various limited facilities, located very strategically in a business location. This study uses qualitative and quantitative analysis with a sample of 75 respondents, taken by a purposive sampling technique. The data has been collected and processed using the Structural Equation Model methodology. The findings of this study are, integrated entrepreneurship education has a positive effect on multidimensional poverty alleviation; integrated entrepreneurship education has a positive effect on entrepreneurship intention; entrepreneurship intention has a positive effect on multidimensional poverty alleviation; and integrated entrepreneurship education has a positive effect on multidimensional poverty alleviation indirectly through entrepreneurship intention.


INTRODUCTION
Jakarta, as the center of government and the nation's capital, is still facing problems of poverty and unemployment. This is due to the long-standing COVID-19 pandemic, where data as of February 2020 shows that the unemployment rate in Indonesia has reached 6.88 million people (Bappenas, 2020). There are three important things that have become important concerns related to poverty. First, a high poverty rate will make it increasingly difficult for the eligible portion of the population to obtain credit loans. Second, high poverty will weaken social stability and solidarity. And lastly, high poverty will prevent poor people from accessing economic resources. One of the causes of poverty is the inequality of development. The impact of this poverty is the non-fulfillment of basic needs such as food, clothing, housing, education, health,

Ellyana Amran
adequate housing and neglect of community welfare. (Huraerah, 2005) said that the cause of the failure of poverty alleviation is that the government only views poverty as an economic problem. (Ras, 2013) also said that the government only focused on income factors, thus ignoring multidimensional factors, namely social, cultural, and political. (Syawaluddin, 2015) said that poverty occurs because the government fails to provide employment and business opportunities for the community, where the distribution of access to economic resources is uneven and it is difficult for the community to develop productive businesses.
As a result, (Chaniago, 2015)  to try and strive to achieve their goals. A strong entrepreneurial intention will foster the process of finding information on the business that will be planned (Krueger, Reilly, & Carsrud, 2000). Section 3 is the research methodology; Section 4 is a result and discussion of the analysis; and Section 5 is the conclusion and implication.

The theoretical framework and hypotheses
The theoretical framework discusses that there is a direct relationship between  indicators.

Alleviation (MPA)
IEE is important because it acts as a driving force to build and develop entrepreneurial activities through knowledge, skills, and motivation, which aims to prepare skilled entrepreneurs in their fields, ready to work and create jobs and able to compete globally (Ekpoh & Edet, 2011;Hussain & Norashidah, 2015;Izedonmi & Okafor, 2008). In this IEE, students will be provided with not only theory, but also skills and competitions that will give them awareness to capture commercial opportunities in the market (Elmuti,

Intregated Entrepreneurship Education (IEE) and Entrepreneurship Intention (EI).
The proper implementation of the IEE is not only a focus of knowledge related to entrepreneurship but is a combination of theory and practice of business creation skills that will move the soul to seize entrepreneurial opportunities (Elmuti et al., 2012;Malach & Malach, 2014). The wider the entrepreneurial knowledge that a person understands, the more it will affect a person's perspective and attitude, such that they are not afraid to take risks in running a business. This is because they have confidence in their ability to run their business (Sánchez, 2013 So, based on the above review, the proposed hypothesis is: H2: There is a positive effect of integrated entrepreneurship education on entrepreneurship intention.

Entrepreneurship intention (EI) and
Multidimensional Poverty Alleviation

(MPA)
A person's entrepreneurial interest can be seen by how strong his desire to start a business is (Engle et al., 2010). Of course, this must be followed by a strong commitment where there must be an effort to find information on the business plan that will

RESULT AND DISCUSION.
Regarding sex, the largest part of the   Table 2 shows the results of the validity and reliability tests that the correlation between each indicator and the total construct score in each variable shows a significant result and shows that p-value < 0.05, which indicates that the data results for all variables are valid.
The Cronbach's Alpha result in this research is greater than 0.6 which means the result of the data is considered reliable. Table 3 shows the mean result of the perception of intergated entrepreneurship education based on data processing.  We also process the data about the entrepreneurial intentions of respondents in Krendang. The result of data processing is given in   And last, we also processed the data multidimensional poverty alleviation respondents in Krendang. The result of data processing is given in table 5.   Ellyana Amran Table 6 showed that all constructs used to make research models in the analysis processes of confirmatory factor, Chi-Square, Probability, RMSEA, TL, and CFI had fulfilled the goodness of fit criteria. The GFI was under the cut-off value but still within the tolerance limit, which was usually called marginal, so the model could be considered fit.  (Ramadani et al., 2017).  (Fayolle et al., 2014).

Conclusion
The

Implications:
1. Increase awareness and the role of the poor so that they have a responsibility to use social assistance for policy purposes, not for consumptive purposes.
2. Intensively explore the potential for selfhelp, especially in slum areas, as a source of economic activity for the local poor.